data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The easiest explanation for why the accents are absent in FE (→EE1) is that they were added to A after [FC] had been finished. In GE all marks were recreated as long accents, while in EE2, in which they were almost certainly added after GE1 – as short accents. In the main text we keep the differences between the marks visible in A.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: Long accents, EE revisions, Inaccuracies in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins