data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
There is no doubt that the marks of A should be interpreted as long accents – all three begin slightly before the crotchets they concern, and they intersect their stems. However, due to the accents' significant length – they reach the 4th quaver in respective halves of bars – in GE they were interpreted as hairpins and were additionally extended. FE recreated the accents correctly, probably on the basis of [FC], which was less ambiguous. In EE the FE accents were provided with the form of standard, short marks.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Long accents, GE revisions, EE inaccuracies
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins