data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FE1
compare
The authenticity of the small slur running from the grace note and visible in FE (→EE) seems questionable. Chopin would not write conventional small slurs combining grace notes with main notes. It is also unlikely that it could be a vertical slur meaning an arpeggio, since the very grace note repeats the preceding semiquaver. It could be an erroneously recreated tie to c2.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
notation: Slurs