& arpeggio signs in 
, L.H. arpeggio sign & R.H. slur in 
In the main text we keep the authentic notation of the grace note as a small crotchet, although in this context it is clear that we are dealing with an ordinary short grace note. Such inaccuracies in the notation of grace notes are quite frequent in Chopin's works. This kind of notation was not repeated by any other source, which, however, does not allow us to consider Chopin's possible revisions in [FC] or FE, since Fontana would routinely change non-slashed grace notes to slashed ones. The absence of arpeggios in FE could be explained by an oversight (by Fontana in [FC] or by the engraver) or by the arpeggios having been added to A after [FC] had already been finished. The latter is indicated by the fact that in A the R.H. arpeggio overlaps with the accidentals, which almost certainly means that Chopin did not leave space for an arpeggio while writing the chord. In GE the L.H. arpeggio was reproduced correctly, while in the R.H. the Chopinesque vertical slur (indicating an arpeggio) was considered a conventional slur running from the grace note. This version was adopted by EE2.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, GE revisions
notation: Ornaments