data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The missing second staccato dot in FE (→EE) may have resulted from an oversight by Fontana in [FC] or by the engraver of FE. It is also likely that Chopin added dots in A after [FC] had already been finished, and then added only the first one while proofreading FE1. The absence of both dots in EE2 must be an oversight, while the slur in GE2 – an arbitrary revision to make the articulation of the 1st crotchet resemble the articulation of the subsequent crotchets in this phrase. In the main text we suggest the dots of A (→GE1) and two further ones, modelled after the more accurate notation of the sources in analogous bars.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Errors in FE, Errors in EE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins