data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Page:
Source:
p. 2, b. 18-32
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
The scope of the slur in the 2nd half of bar 19 is unclear in FE – this bar is the last in the line and the slur suggests continuation, but there is no conclusion to it in bar 20. Taking into account the slur over an identical motif in bars 20-21, we can be sure that the mistake was made at the beginning of bar 20, and the slur is supposed to reach a2 in bar 20. This is how we reproduce it in the main text, then.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Uncertain slur continuation
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
FE1, FEO, GE1, GE2, EE1