Page: 
Source: 
p. 7, b. 117-131
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 2, b. 18-32
p. 3, b. 33-62
p. 4, b. 63-78
p. 5, b. 79-98
p. 6, b. 99-116
p. 7, b. 117-131
p. 8, b. 132-144
p. 9, b. 145-165
p. 10, b. 166-182
p. 11, b. 183-202
p. 12, b. 203-223
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link Main text


  b. 125-127

Slurs from 4th & 5th quaver in FE (→GE,EE)

Slurs from 4th quaver suggested by the editors

Slurs from 5th quaver, our alternative suggestion

Taking into account the similarities between bar 125 and 127, it seems highly likely that Chopin wanted the L.H. slurs to be of the same range. However, the slur in bar 125 clearly starts from the quaver at the beginning of the 2nd half of the bar, while the respective slur in bar 127, clearly inaccurate, begins somewhere between the last two thirds in the top voice. This inaccuracy must have resulted from the layout, in which the 4th quaver in the bar and the L.H. top voice are written on the top stave, under the R.H. part, which makes it impossible to begin a slur earlier. Therefore, we assume that, following the principle of minimal intervention in the source notation, it indicates a slur running from the accented f1-a1 third. In this quasi-literal interpretation of the sources, the slurs in both phrases are not identical. Therefore, in the main text in bar 127 we provide a slur running from the quaver at the beginning of the 2nd half of the bar, in accordance with the slur in bar 125. As an alternative solution we suggest slurs from the 5th quaver of the bar in both places, which can be regarded as a contextual interpretation of the discussed places.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, EE inaccuracies

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEO, GE1, GE2, EE1