Page: 
Source: 
p. 7, b. 117-131
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 2, b. 18-32
p. 3, b. 33-62
p. 4, b. 63-78
p. 5, b. 79-98
p. 6, b. 99-116
p. 7, b. 117-131
p. 8, b. 132-144
p. 9, b. 145-165
p. 10, b. 166-182
p. 11, b. 183-202
p. 12, b. 203-223
Main text
Main text
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FEO - Orda copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Revised impression of GE1
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 129

Slur in FEO, possible interpretation

No sign in FE1 (→GE,EE)

The curved line entered in pencil into FEO could be interpreted as a slur indicating that the F chord opening this bar should be combined with the preceding D chord. We do not include this slur in the main text, as its meaning remains uncertain. In bars 129-131 in FEO there is a number of other marks, proving that this fragment was being thoroughly developed during lessons; only some of the marks can be interpreted accurately enough for them to be included in the main text or at least in the FEO transcription.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Annotations in FEO

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FEO, GE1, GE2, EE1