data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
The curved line entered in pencil into FEO could be interpreted as a slur indicating that the F chord opening this bar should be combined with the preceding D chord. We do not include this slur in the main text, as its meaning remains uncertain. In bars 129-131 in FEO there is a number of other marks, proving that this fragment was being thoroughly developed during lessons; only some of the marks can be interpreted accurately enough for them to be included in the main text or at least in the FEO transcription.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information
issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Annotations in FEO
notation: Slurs