Page:
Source:
p. 3, b. 33-62
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
We assume that the wedge in FE (→EE) was supposed to refer to both octaves or that the other one was forgotten. However, this articulation should undoubtedly be implemented by both hands, hence in the main text we suggest the supplemented FE text (→EE). The absence of the mark in GE is most probably an oversight. See also the note in bar 60.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Errors in GE
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Missing markers on sources:
FE1, FEO, GE1, GE2, EE1