data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e59ea/e59ea164cc09fb20651e39bd84b5beefb140cf1e" alt=""
The accidentals visible in FE next to the chords on the 3rd and 5th quaver are questionable, in spite of the notation being formally correct. All of them are actually superfluous – the sound would not change if they were removed, while the flats to b and b
1 are hardly even cautionary accidentals. According to us, all accidentals were accidentally put a note too low, which, after correcting it accordingly, results in the GE and EE version. This is the version, natural and harmonically simplest – an entire bar based on one chord – that we provide in the main text. On the other hand, we consider a version requiring a minimal interference with the notation to be the FE text – with shifted naturals so that they raise e
1 and e
2 to e1 and e2, which, however, results in a less artful harmonic sequence with a tonally inexplicable d among d
in the preceding bars and d
on the 6th quaver in the discussed bar.
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, GE revisions
notation: Pitch