Op. 2, Variations in B♭ major
Op. 10, 12 Etudes
Op. 11, Concerto in E minor
Op. 21, Concerto in F minor
Op. 22, Polonaise in E♭ major
Op. 24, 4 Mazurkas
Op. 25, 12 Etudes
Op. 26, 2 Polonaises
Op. 27, 2 Nocturnes
Op. 28, 24 Preludes
Op. 30, 4 Mazurkas
Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor
Op. 50, 3 Mazurkas
Op. 63, 3 Mazurkas
Op. 64, 3 Waltzes
(Op. 4), Sonata in C minor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
The bass f at the beginning of each of these bars is a dotted minim in FE. Formally speaking, it is only the notation in bar 84 that is clearly erroneous, since both f notes, combined by a tie, belong to one voice, which thus includes 9 quavers in this bar. On the other hand, the notation of the bass note in bar 83 is awkward and redundant, yet it can be interpreted as two-part writing – the dotted minim at the beginning of the bar is overlapped by the sound of the crotchet in the 2nd half of the bar belonging to a new voice (Chopin would often add a voice inside a bar without marking the theoretically necessary rests preceding a given note). However, according to us, in both bars we are dealing with a mistake by the FE engraver, who inserted dotted minims as if out of momentum, repeating the notation of bars 81-82 – cf. similar mistakes in bar 56 and 58. In GE it was only the mistake in bar 84 that was corrected, while in EE – only in bar 83.
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, GE revisions, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Rhythm
Back to note