data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
At the beginning of the 6th quaver in the bar, in FE one can see an f-e1 seventh. The comparison with an analogous figure at the end of bar 142, featuring a G
-e
sixth, points to a highly likely mistake. This is how it was assessed in GE and EE, replacing the seventh by a g
-e
1 sixth, which we include in the main text.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, GE revisions
notation: Pitch