Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-36
p. 1, b. 1-36
p. 2, b. 37-74
p. 3, b. 75-112
p. 4, b. 113-147
PE1 - First Polish edition
Main text
PE - Polish edition
PE1 - First Polish edition
PE2 - Revised impression of PE1
PE3 - Corrected impression of PE2
PE4 - Revised impression of PE3
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
PE - Polish edition
PE1 - First Polish edition
PE2 - Revised impression of PE1
PE3 - Corrected impression of PE2
PE4 - Revised impression of PE3
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF PE1 - First Polish edition


  b. 36

Digit 4 in sources

No that digit in the main text

The authenticity of the fingering digit over the 1st quaver is questionable when we compare it with the undoubtedly Chopinesque fingering of the passages of a similar structure, containing a similar combination of white and black keys – cf. the Etude in A minor, Op. 25 No. 11, bar 82 or the Concerto in F minor, Op. 21, III mov., bar 97 and 101-102, not to mention the Etude in A minor, Op. 10 No. 2, the main technical goal of which is developing efficiency of fingers in such combinations. In the main text we omit this digit, which does not exclude the use of the 4th finger, but at the same time it leaves the door open for another possibility, which many pianists – including, apparently, probably Chopin – would consider more convenient.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in PE

notation: Fingering

Missing markers on sources: PE1, PE2, PE3, PE4, GE1