Pitch
|
b. 12
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
It cannot be ruled out that the source version with a rest on the 3rd beat of the bar is authentic – small differences between the first appearance of a certain detail and its repetitions – cf. bar 20, 44, 52 and 116 – are not uncommon in Chopin's style, cf., e.g. the Scherzo in B category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in PE |
|||||||
|
b. 54
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In PE1 the treble clef is placed before the 1st L.H. crotchet. The patent mistake was corrected in GE and PE2 (→PE3→PE4). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors in PE , |
|||||||
|
b. 63
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||
|
b. 67
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
A comparison with all analogous bars (and with all bars provided with such accompaniment) is a convincing argument that the octave present in the sources is almost certainly a mistake by the engraver. Therefore, in the main text we give a single e note, as is the case with the remaining bars. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 87
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
minor, Op. 31, bar 273, 284, 375 and 396 – it is only in the first one that the chord includes a d seventh; the remaining ones contain e. However, the individual presentations of this phrase of the Scherzo differ also in other details, whereas in the Waltz it is practically the only difference between the five occurrences of this eight-bar section. Due to the above, we believe that it was rather a mistake in the interpretation of [A]. 
to g
2. The accidental is present in the sources in an analogous context in bars 79 and 103.
