Issues : Errors in PE
b. 54
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In PE1 the treble clef is placed before the 1st L.H. crotchet. The patent mistake was corrected in GE and PE2 (→PE3→PE4). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors in PE , |
|||||||||||
b. 89
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
The digit '4' over the last quaver is present in the sources only the second time (bar 89/113). The mark in bar 89 was most probably overlooked by the engraver of PE (→GE). In the main text we give the complete notation of bar 89/113. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in PE |
|||||||||||
b. 90-92
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In bars 90 and 92 and in their written-out repetitions, the 1st R.H. chord has three versions in PE. None of them seem authentic:
In the main text we give the version of GE, which, according to us, is the most likely reconstruction of [A], performed on the basis of PE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Errors in PE , |
|||||||||||
b. 92
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In PE there is a crotchet with a rest in bar 92, while in bar 92/116 – a minim. One of the versions is most probably erroneous; however, there is not sufficient evidence to decide which one. To the main text we choose the minim, since the repetition of the section encompassing bars 89-96 seems to have been reproduced slightly more accurately – cf. the notes on fingering (bar 89) and the slur (bars 95-96). This version was introduced in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Errors in PE |
|||||||||||
b. 99
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
The missing hairpin in bar 99/123 is most probably an oversight by the engraver, hence in the main text we include (by means of the repeat sign) the mark from bar 99 twice. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in PE |