![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 119-123
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The missing arpeggios to the tenth chords in bars 119, 121 and 123 are most probably an oversight by the copyist in FC (→GE1), revised in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 123
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 127
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 127-129
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The three-note chords present in FE (→EE) are much more likely here, since they prepare and open the chordal sequence in bars 129-132. The FC version almost certainly resulted from the copyist's carelessness, who did not take care of the visibility of the notes written on the ledger line. This is indicated by the notation of the first two chords in bar 129, in which it is also the e1 notes that are practically imperceptible, although their presence is unquestionable. In GE1 it was also c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Uncertain notes on ledger lines , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 130-132
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In this chromatic progression, the notation of the sources does not contain any mistakes, and Chopin took care of a few cautionary accidentals – to g category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »