Issues : Authentic corrections of FC
|
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In the main text we give the FC (→GE) version, entered by Chopin instead of the crossed-out chord, preserved in FE (→EE). Chopin's correction also included the addition of category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||
|
b. 101-104
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||
|
b. 102-104
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
The pedalling added by Chopin to FC in bars 102-103 could be inaccurate, as indicated by a comparison with the markings – also Chopinesque – present in analogous bars 6-7. The reason for the inaccuracies may lie in haste, visible, e.g. in the careless handwriting. Taking into account the above, in the main text we suggest the pedalling of bars 6-7, which is better thought out. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||
|
b. 105-106
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||
|
b. 110-111
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
According to us, the pedal markings added by Chopin to FC could be inaccurate in this case. In the main text we suggest the probably more carefully added markings of FC in bars 6-7 (also by Chopin). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
in 
and of the pedalling and the extension of the R.H. slur.
in 
