![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 35-51
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In GE cautionary sharps were added to the top notes of the dominant chords in bars 35, 37, 41, 43, 45, 49 and 51. There is a similar situation in subsequent, analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In FC the last L.H. f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 53-61
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
As before, in GE cautionary sharps were added to the top notes of the dominant chords in bars 53, 57, 59 and 61. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 54-62
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In bars 54, 56-57 and 62 particular sources do not include some of the slurs linking the semiquaver to the chord. A comparison of the versions suggests that both in FC and FE at least one slur present in [A] was left out. On the other hand, both in EE and GE the texts of the bases were revised by adding slurs, yet none of them did it consistently. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
We justify the long accents suggested in the main text by inaccuracies in the reproduction of such accents in other pieces by Chopin both by Fontana (cf., e.g. the Scherzo in B category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »