Issues : Inaccuracies in FC
b. 25-28
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The slurring of the first phrase in this section is inaccurate or erroneous both in FC and FE. It concerns particularly FC, in which, when interpreted literally, the slurs are unclear and almost certainly incomplete. The slurring of FE can be easily guessed, as a result of which a corrected version of this slurring is already present in EE; in this situation, it is the version we give in the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC , Inaccuracies in FC , Uncertain slur continuation |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The ben legato indication visible in FE (→EE) under the L.H. part is most probably a Chopinesque explanation of the vague abbreviation b. legato used in FC, which in GE – probably due to uncertainty as to its meaning – was replaced by legato. In the main text we move this indication – in the form used in FE – over the L.H. part, since it is particularly the two top voices in the chords that can be performed legato. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 49-53
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In the main text we include the staccato dots in the L.H. part present in FE (→EE). There are no doubts that this kind of articulation, correlated with the pedalling, conveys Chopin's idea correctly, which cannot be said about the isolated dot in FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 55-56
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In FC the 'd' letters belonging to the marks blended in these bars with the staccato dots under the bass notes, which resulted in the absence of dots in GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |