Verbal indications
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
Differences in the wording of the title – see the Mazurka in C minor no. 1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The absence of the dedication in FC (→GE) suggests that the decision concerning a dedication came relatively late in the publishing process of the Mazurkas. See the Mazurka in C minor no. 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Dedications |
|||||||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The ben legato indication visible in FE (→EE) under the L.H. part is most probably a Chopinesque explanation of the vague abbreviation b. legato used in FC, which in GE – probably due to uncertainty as to its meaning – was replaced by legato. In the main text we move this indication – in the form used in FE – over the L.H. part, since it is particularly the two top voices in the chords that can be performed legato. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 54-55
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In FE the dashes marking the range of cresc. reach only the end of the line of the text, as a result of which they are absent in bars 54-55. In the main text we give the undoubtedly correct markings of FC (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
in 
