|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
None of the sources bears traces of changes here, which makes it impossible to determine its cause. A mistake seems more likely in FC – it is easier not to write a dot and a beam than to write them without any reason. However, this does not discredit the version of FC, since Chopin could have changed the rhythm in [A], reviewing it before handing it over to Fontana. In the main text we give the rhythm of FC, being the principal source; however, we regard the version of FE as equal. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Dotted or even rhythm |
|||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In the main text we omit the Chopinesque category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
|
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
The absence of pedalling in FC (→GE) could be caused by the same issue as the absence of the R.H. slur – distraction at the end of a page. Another possibility could be an oversight by Chopin, who was adding pedalling to FC – starting from bar 29, which opens a new page in FC, the pedal markings are written in Chopin's hand (to bar 39). category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of FC , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||
|
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In FC Chopin deleted all three L.H. chords written by Fontana and replaced them with new ones. The reason was a mistake by the copyist, who wrote g category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of FC , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||
|
b. 31-39
|
composition: Op. 30, Mazurka in D♭ major
..
In FC there are cautionary accidentals written in crayon to the last quaver in bars 31, 35 and 39 (a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts |
to g
2, present in all sources, totally unjustified in this place. The same in bar 35.
to c2 and a