![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In FE the last R.H. note is a crotchet, as a result of which the bar includes 7 quavers. In the main text we correct this mistake after the FC notation (→GE); this version is also in EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Rhythmic errors , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The FC accent was most probably written by Fontana, which suggests that it was overlooked in FE. The version without an accent could be however considered equal due to the dynamics of this bar, which was not specified – after the 7-bar cresc., category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||
b. 31-63
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In FE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||
b. 39-47
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
There is no accidental to the last grace note in bars 39 and 47 in FC, while in FE in bars 39, 45 and 47. The patent oversights, the ones in bars 39 and 47 most probably by Chopin himself, who considered the earlier category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of FC |