Verbal indications
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
Vivace was entered into FC by Chopin after crossing out Allegretto. The composer could have been considering a more pronounced indication suggesting the different nature of this Mazurka with respect to the first and fourth ones, described as Allegretto non tanto and Allegretto, respectively. Cf. changes to the tempo/character indications in the autograph of the Preludes, Op. 28. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Changes of tempo markings |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
Difference in the wording of the title – see the Mazurka in C minor no. 1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The absence of the dedication in FC (→GE) suggests that the decision concerning a dedication came relatively late in the publishing process of the Mazurkas. See the Mazurka in C minor no. 1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Dedications |
||||||
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The difference in the position of could result from the vague [A] notation, in which the mark was probably in the place of the bar line (Chopin would write separate bar lines on each stave). The musical context requires to be introduced already from d2 in bar 8, hence in the main text we put it at the end of this bar, in accordance with FC (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
||||||
b. 17-30
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In FC both poco a poco cresc. - - - indications (in bars 17-23 and 25-31) are added in Chopin's hand, which means that they were also added in the stage of proofreading FE or to the basis of FE. The same in bars 49-55 and 57-63. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |