Rhythm
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In FE the last R.H. note is a crotchet, as a result of which the bar includes 7 quavers. In the main text we correct this mistake after the FC notation (→GE); this version is also in EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Rhythmic errors , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||
|
b. 10
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In EE the g1-g2 octave is a quaver, which is a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
FC is missing the 3rd beat in the L.H., which was supplemented in GE by adding a crotchet rest. It is also FE (→EE) that contain a rest, hence there are no doubts that it was a crotchet rest that the copyist overlooked. Cf. a similar oversight by Fontana in the Mazurka in D category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of FC |
|||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
Completing the R.H. top voice with a rest on the 3rd beat in the bar is an example of ultra-correct notation, used by Chopin only exceptionally, and in this case even misleading – f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
no. 3, 
1 in the last crotchet, belonging allegedly to the bottom voice, is actually a beginning of the next phrase in the top voice. In the main text we omit it, since it could have been added by Fontana or removed by Chopin in the proofreading of or in the basis for