data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
FE1
compare
As in bar 29, the version of FE (→EE) is most probably a mistake, since there are no reasons to differentiate bar 53 from bar 61. In FC the note was added – probably by Chopin – which is evidenced by the fact that the stem of this chord was being extended.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information
issues: Authentic corrections of FC
notation: Pitch