b. 41
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
It is difficult to firmly conclude who entered into FC (→GE) – Fontana or Chopin. As was the case with poco ritenuto 3 bars earlier, it seems unlikely that performing the repetition of the preceding eight-bar section with the same dynamics would be the only acceptable possibility. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The improved voice leading, achieved by avoiding parallel B-f and c-g fifths, most probably resulted from the Chopinesque proofreading of FE (→EE). The fact that this version appears in GE2 suggests the use of FE in the revision of this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
||||
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In the main text we include the mark of FE (→EE) and add [] as in analogous bar 20. The missing indications in FC (→GE) most probably resulted from an oversight by the copyist. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: No pedal release mark , Errors of FC |
||||
b. 54-62
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In the main text, we add cautionary naturals before b1 in bars 22 and 30. The reviser of GE1 also added them in FC; they were subsequently introduced in this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts |