mUltimate Chopin

Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 52-73
p. 1, b. 1-15
p. 2, b. 16-30
p. 3, b. 31-51
p. 4, b. 52-73
p. 5, b. 74-91
p. 6, b. 92-106
p. 7, b. 107-127
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French Edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German Edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Second, revised impression of GE2
GE4 - Third impression of GE2
EE - English Edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Later impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French Edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German Edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Second, revised impression of GE2
GE4 - Third impression of GE2
EE - English Edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Later impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 58

 

 

 

The slur in EE, which ends at the penultimate grace note, may be a result of Chopin's slurring, which is often imprecise, and the literal – in this particular case – interpretation of the autograph (base text). As far as the performance is concerned, the difference is not significant. FE is lacking the slur.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Slurs