Issues : Long accents
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We consider the interpretation of accents in A in bars 15-17 as long ones to be more probable, as they emphasise the imposition of longer rhythmic values (crotchets) on the triplet figuration. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||
b. 16-17
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We consider the interpretation of A's accents as long to be more probable, as they emphasise the imposition of longer rhythmic values (crotchets) on the triplet figuration. In the editions, all accents were recreated as short ones. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The accent in A is clearly longer than the three previous ones. In GE, similarly as in the entire Impromptu – it was interpreted as a regular, short accent. The short accent is also in FE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||
b. 31-32
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
It is unclear whether the accents in A should be interpreted as short or long. In bars 31-32 it seems more probable to interpret them as short ones. Similar doubts concern analogous bars 113-114 and 117-118. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents |