Issues : GE revisions

b. 87-88

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

 
 
 
..

Lack of the accents in A, FE and EE probably does not mean that the motifs in those bars are to be performed differently than in the remaining analogous places. Therefore, taking into account the accents added in GE2 (→GE3GE4) seems to be completely justified. However, we maintain the notation of the basic source (A), as the remaining sources do not clearly indicate Chopin's inattention only in this case while writing A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 90-91

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

 
 
 
 
 
..

We give the crescendo hairpins of FE. At the same time we correct the clearly imprecise sign in the 2nd half of bar 91 on the basis of analogous bar 9.
The signs in EE in bar 91 are probably erroneous – it seems that it is the signs from bar 92 or 94 that were placed here.
Lack of remarks in A (→GE1) is probably Chopin's oversight. In GE2 (→GE3GE4) they were completed according to bars 9-10.  

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions

b. 92

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

..

We add a cautionary flat next to e2. The sign was completed in GE2

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals

b. 101-102

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

 
..

The system of ties in GE was arbitrarily changed.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 103

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

 
..

GE and EE have a different system of quaver ties – it must be an arbitrary change. We adopt the notation of A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions