Issues : Annotations in teaching copies
|
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
Lack of natural next to d1 is an obvious Chopin's error. The version with a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Annotations in FES |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
A, FE and EE are lacking the natural raising a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Accidentals in different octaves |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 49-50
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The fingering written in FES is universal: it can be used while performing each of the bar's versions. On the other hand, the fingering of FEJ may be applied only in the version of FE (we consider the version of EE as erroneous). The fingering also demonstrates that Chopin accepted the version of FE, which is a strong argument for its authenticity. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In A (→GE1) and FE there is no natural raising d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We give Chopin's fingering written into FES. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies |
(without the flat raising to a) is musically possible, yet Chopin's annotation in 
