Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The additional crotchet stem in FE may be an authentic version of the text, however, a mistake of the engraver cannot be excluded. Cf. remarks concerning bars 15, 16 and analogous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||
|
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE |
|||||||
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In FE the sign of accent on the 1st quaver in the L.H. was omitted, which is certainly an error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The indication category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||
|
b. 27-30
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In FE and EE the stems sustaining the first notes of the triplets are written inaccurately. FE has them only in bar 29 (and the first in bar 28). EE is lacking the last four ones (from the 3rd one in bar 29). A minor inaccuracy can also be observed in A: there is no 2nd stem in bar 29. Yet Chopin's intention to sustain all the bass notes in that fragment is doubtless, although the correct notation in the faultless form appears only in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE |
may have been overlooked in 
