data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Lack of the cresc. hairpins in A (→GE1) in those bars (and also in bars 90-94) is most probably a result of Chopin's inattention. We give the hairpins after FE, compatible with those which we adopted for analogous bars 83-84.
The accidental omission of the marks is indicated by:
– presence of hairpins in A before and between the aforementioned fragments, as well as after them;
– presence of the indications in FE and EE;
– presence of analogous indications in bars 5-6 and 8-12.
The omissions are one of the proofs of Chopin's slightly worse concentration while writing the reprise in A (cf. characteristics of A)
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Back to note