Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The change of time signature in FE probably resulted from the engraver's inattention. In Chopin's pieces, it was common that engravers did not differentiate between category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||||||||||
|
b. 1-6
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
None of the editions based on manuscripts reproduced all 4 slurs over the pairs of chords in bars 1-2 and 5-6. EE1 overlooked yet 2 out of 3 slurs in FE. The complete set of slurs in EE2 results from a compilation of the slur of EE1 with the slurs reproduced from GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
FE erroneously gives d instead of c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the middle of the bar in FEcor there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
in 
in 
Minor.
as the last L.H. quaver in each of these bars. The errors, caused probably by this note in bar 1 being written somewhat imprecisely in