Issues : EE inaccuracies
|
b. 410-419
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A, the staccato marks at the beginning of bars 410-411 and 418-419 (in the part of the R.H.) are clear wedges – cf. the dots in the part of the L.H. The editions reproduced them as dots (as in the entire Concerto); at the same time, EE overlooked the sign in bar 410, whereas FE – in bar 418 (added in EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Wedges |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 412-435
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A the slurs over the motifs of the bottom voice encompass the quavers only or reach the minim in the next bar. However, the differences are almost certainly of an accidental nature, hence in the main text we unify them, assuming 6-note slurs to be more frequent in A (7 longer, 2 shorter and 3 questionable). Accidental inaccuracies are also present in the remaining sources, except for GE, in which all slurs encompass 5 notes. The majority of the doubts concerning the range of the slurs is due to the ending lines: a slur suggesting continuation is not finished in a new line (b. 418-419 in A and FC, 432-433 in A, 412-413, 420-421 and 428-429 in FE and b. 422-423 in EE). In such situations we give shorter slurs in our transcriptions, just like in b. 426-427 in A and 412-413 in 428-429 in FC, which may be thought to be dubious. EE omitted the slur in b. 420-421. Neither FC nor FE, EE and GE reproduced the notation of the Stichvorlage correctly; however, the total number of inaccuracies in this section is smaller than the first time (b. 310-333). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in FC , Uncertain slur continuation |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 415-416
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Three clearly long accents written in A were reproduced in GE1, without any apparent reason, in an explicitly varied manner. However, FE restored the notation of A, which could be seen as Chopin's proofreading. Both in EE and GE2 the Chopinesque long accents were reproduced as common short accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 430
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In all sources, the slurs are to be deemed inaccurate. According to us, it should encompass all small quavers of the passage and the main note to which it leads. It is compliant with the convention of writing down such ornaments. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 443
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
& > in 
3 in 
