mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Omission of current key accidentals

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 265

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

In AsI, Af and A (→GE1→EE1→EE2) there is no  lowering c2 to c2. Chopin's patent oversight was corrected by FE1, GE2 (→GE3,FESB) and EE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions

b. 267

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) is missing the  lowering g1 to g1. Chopin's oversight is proven by the ​​​​​​​ in the respective place of identical bar 265. The accidental was added only just in GE3. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 271

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

FE (→EE1→EE2) lacks ​​​​​​​ raising a1 to a1. The patent mistake was corrected in GE and EE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE

b. 272

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In FE, there is no  raising g1 to g1. This patent inaccuracy could have already been present in the manuscript. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals

b. 272

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In GE1 (→GE2), there is no  before the second quaver. It must be a mistake – between two bars based on the same four-note diminished chord containing g, a possible g would require a cautionary , not to mention the tied g in violin II. It was most probably [A] that was the source of the mistake, since the  in FE was added only just in print. The mark was added in GE3.  

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE