Issues : Authentic corrections of FC
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The slur in FC was almost certainly added by Chopin, who added an analogous slur while proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
The hairpin was entered into FC (→GE) by Chopin – cf. the hairpin in the previous bar, which was copied by Fontana from [A]. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 22-24
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
In bars 22 and 24 the L.H. sets of markings – consisting of a staccato dot and a slur – could have been added by Chopin to [A] after FE had already been engraved. It is less likely that they could have been added by Chopin to FC, since they are not characteristic of Chopin's additions. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text we give long accents, written most probably by Chopin in FC. In this copy, one can also see deletions of the previously written accents under the part of the L.H., which shows that the double accents of FE is a previous version. Lack of the signs in EE1 (→EE2) is certainly a mistake, corrected in EE3 on the basis of GE1. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |