Issues : Corrections of AI
b. 132-133
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations , Main-line changes , Corrections of AI |
||||||||
b. 139
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
It seems that both published versions of the beginning of this bar were already present in AI, in which one can see a crossing-out of the crotchet, probably G, next to the rest. It means that Chopin hesitated presumably until the very end of the work on the publishing of the Mazurka, and maybe even later. In the main text we give the version of GE, just like in b. 134, in which a similar discrepancy appears. Both bars implement the same rhythmic and melodic scheme (co-creating the entire eight-bar section), which, according to us, implies that an analogous version should apply to both places. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Chopin's hesitations , Accompaniment changes , Corrections of AI |
||||||||
b. 159
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In this layout, the rest in AI, although formally justified, could suggest the g note to be played by the L.H. Therefore, it seems that it could have been the reason for its removal in AF (→FE→EE). Chopin omitted it also in GE. In analogous b. 167 the rest was crossed out both in AI and AF. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Corrections of AI |
||||||||
b. 166
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the simplified – most probably by Chopin in [AG] – notation of GE. The only perceptible difference affecting the performance is the rhythmic value of the f1 note in the chord on the 2nd quaver of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Chopin's hesitations , Corrections of AI |
||||||||
b. 195
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
There are two versions in AsI – the earlier one, written in normal-sized notes, which we consider to be the text of this source, and the later one, marked with additional small notes. This second version, almost identical to the one added in AsI in bar 179, can be considered a first attempt at the final version appearing in other sources. The notation of the second version is not univocal:
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes , Main-line changes , Corrections of AI |