Issues : Different values of chord components
b. 92-100
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The rhythmic value of a in bars 92 and 100 – see bar 84. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 101-102
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of GE1, which may seem to be a result of a serious misunderstanding or mistake, is probably a clumsy attempt at correcting the mistakes and inaccuracies of the notation of FC. For the copyist put a superfluous dot extending the d3 minim in the chord at the beginning of bar 101, whereas in the 1st chord in bar 102 he wrote the note head of the middle a2 in such a way that it is practically imperceptible (the fact that the note was to be there is proven by the extending dot). The above defects do not hamper the correct interpretation of the text if one is aware of A; however, having only FC at his disposal, the engraver of GE1 considered both dots in b. 101 as well as the one in b. 102, which seems to concern a non-existent note, to be mistakes. Eventually, he omitted the aimless (under these circumstances) curved line running from the a2 minim in b. 101 and leading nowhere. The reviser of GE2 also did not guess the correct text; it appears only just in GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Different values of chord components , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||||||||
b. 131
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly correct rhythmic notation of the middle notes of the chord, transmitted by GC (→GE). Among the remaining versions, the first is erroneous, whereas the second – inaccurate (probably due to a misunderstanding of the notation of [A]). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Different values of chord components , FE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 132
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE (→EE) is most probably inaccurate – cf. bar 131. In the main text we write the chord in the version of GC using two-part notation, in order to facilitate the interpretation and after the previous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 331
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In GE (→FE,EE) the e1 crotchet is provided with two augmentation dots, which could have been caused by the spot in A, resembling a second dot. It must be a mistake, since this e1 note is continued by the d1 quaver, falling on the 4th quaver in the bar. In FESB this note was placed on one stem with the g1 quaver, which changed its value to a double dotted quaver. It was probably an attempt at correcting the excessive rhythmic value of this note. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Different values of chord components , Errors in GE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |