Issues : fz – f
b. 199
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The Chopin was reproduced in GE1 (→FE→EE) as and . This kind of misinterpretations of would often appear in Chopin's pieces, e.g. in the Etude in E minor, Op. 10 No. 6, bar 21. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , fz – f |
|||||
b. 233
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The change of to is a relatively frequent mistake in the first editions; however, it is generally encountered when the base text to an edition was a manuscript. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , fz – f |
|||||
b. 236
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
GE has a occurring in GE instead of could be a mistake, but it seems more probable that it is a revision based on the analogy with bar 240. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , fz – f |
|||||
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The mark present in FE (→GE,EE) is probably a mistake (cf. analogous bars 84, 88 and 236 where there is a ). Such erroneous swaps of those markings were quite frequent in first pieces published by Chopin in France (cf. the notes to the Etudes: in A Minor, Op. 10 No. 2, bar 12; in E, No. 3, bar 54; in C Minor, No. 4, bars 1, 8, 16, 26, 54; in E Minor, No. 6, bars 21 and 32, in C Minor, No. 12, bar 37). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
|||||
b. 247
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The indication, appearing in the editions, seems to be completely accurate after a few-bar-long crescendo and could have been accepted by Chopin. However, it is most probably only a result of a misinterpretation of A by the engraver of GE1. See also bar 249. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , fz – f |