![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in GC
b. 572-573
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 573-584
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The FE - without slurs - most probably goes back to the original phrasing of these bars. The EE with a slur in bars 581-584 must be Chopin's annotations of the original. In the main text we use undoubtedly the authentic and most precise slurring of GC. The slurs over the new line break (bars 580-581) in GC, when read literally, suggest continuation. Such was the reading of GE, however, we believe Chopin to have meant a new slur from b. 581, just like in EE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 585-590
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present the GC slurring. Literal reading of the slurs extending over the bar line (bars 588-589) suggests continuation. Such is the interpretation of GE and there is an identical slur in EE. However, we believe that Chopin intended here a new slur from b. 589, similarly to what we find in FE category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 605
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
 
category imprint: issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 620
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The GC slur extends over to the rest on the second beat of the bar. This was characteristic of a freestyle writing of slurs by Gutmann (and also quite often by Chopin). category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GC |