Issues : fz – f
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
A possible error of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE) is indicated by the repeated just at the beginning of bar 55. A number of other examples of omission of the letter 'z' in makes this error highly likely. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||||
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the main text we give written in A. As in many different cases (see e.g. the Etude in C minor, No. 4, bar 1), in FE (→GE) is almost certainly a result of misunderstanding of the manuscript by the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , fz – f |
||||||||
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The letter 'z' in the marking was omitted in the first editions of Chopin's works several times – cf., e.g. the Etude in C minor, Op. 10 No. 4, b. 1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Errors in GE , fz – f |
||||||||
b. 154
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing is most probably an oversight of the engraver of FE. The marking featured here in GE1 must also be a mistake, which was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , fz – f |