



Issues : Terzverschreibung error
b. 277-278
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The GC (→GE1) version, although harmonically and pianistically quite possible, is probably erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 282
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
FE1 has an a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Partial corrections |
|||
b. 283-287
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
It is one of the places in which the performance and concert tradition, shaped to a significant extent on GE and established by the deeply rooted for many decades belief that GC is Chopin's autograph, most probably conveys an erroneous text. The absence of visible corrections in the sources based directly on [A] – GC and FE – means that one of the versions is most probably erroneous. The significant majority of arguments supports the correctness of the chord with b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A one can see a deletion before the 1st L.H. crotchet, yet it allows us to decipher the removed element, that is a C1-E category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Terzverschreibung error , Errors in the number of ledger lines , Deletions in A |
|||
b. 285
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE (→EE) is most probably a Terzverschreibung error – in the recapitulation A has an almost unchanged accompaniment, with respect to the exposition, in the entire theme (from bar 273); there are also no visible traces of correction in print in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error |