b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
AT has a clearly different slurring here, reflecting, to a significant extent, the structure of the phrase: the upbeat is not included in the phrasing slur, while above each bars 1-2, there is a separate slur. Cf. bars 6-8, 9-10, 16-17, 18-20. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication in accordance with the title page of the entire opus in GC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication in accordance with the title page of the entire opus in FC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The values of the metronome tempo, both 120 in A and 160 in FC, were written with Chopin's hand, it was most probably also the case in the manuscript base text to EE. Therefore, in the main text we give 160, present in two authentic sources. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Metronome tempos |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The use of time signature is not surprising only in GE1, as FE does not use the indication in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – at all, neither in Op. 10 nor in the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. also the Impromptu in A major, Op. 29). In any case, the correctness and authenticity of the time signature does not raise any doubts thanks to A (→FC). The correct time signature was returned in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |