mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 630-640

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slurs in FE

Slurs in GE & EE
..

In bar 630, 635, 638 and 640 in FE, there are no little slurs combining the grace notes with the quaver that ends the motif. A comparison with the remaining similar bars of this 24-bar section points to oversights of the engraver of FE or of Chopin himself. In the main text, we add the overlooked little slurs like it was performed in GE and EE. 

category imprint:

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 630

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 630-631

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

 in A

No markings in FC (→GE)

  in FE (→EE)
..

In the main text we include the pedalling gradually added by Chopin:

  •  in A, most probably after the preparation of FC, which does not contain the mark;
  •  in FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Corrections in A , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 630-632

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

Just like in b. 179-181, in the main text we add cautionary flats before the E1 and E grace notes in b. 630 and before the D1-D octave in b. 632. The accidentals in b. 630 were added already in GE, whereas those in b. 632 – in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 631-632

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Slur to bar 632 in A (→FC) & EE

Shorter slur in FE & GE
..

In both manuscripts the slur clearly reaches b. 632, although due to the absence of text in this bar – b. 632 opens a section written in an abbreviated manner as repetition of b. 181-244 – it may be considered an inaccuracy. It was regarded as such both in FE and GE. In turn, EE contain the correct slur, probably under the influence of b. 180-181.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE