mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors repeated in GE

b. 367

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In FE (→GE), there is no natural restoring d2. This patent oversight was corrected only in EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in GE

b. 369-370

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

F1 tied in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

F1 repeated in GE3
..

In FE (→GE1→GE2), the tie of F1 is present only in bar 169 (at the end of the line). EE corrected the patent defect, whereas GE3 completely omitted the tie, which is probably a mistake. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in GE

b. 383-384

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In FE (→GE), there is no ending of the slur in a new line. It is one of the frequent mistakes of first editions. The continuation of the slur was added by the reviser of EE.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in GE

b. 399

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

category imprint: Interpretations within context

issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 408

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In FE (→EE), there is no  restoring g1 in the chromatic sequence in the R.H. In GE, this patent mistake was corrected. In addition, in FE there is no  raising c1 to c​​​​​​​1 in the L.H. This mistake was corrected both in GE and EE. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE