![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Rhythmic errors
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In CLI the G1-G octave in bar 5 is a semibreve, while the D1-D octave in bar 6 – a minim. It seems to be highly unlikely for this obvious error to be included in [AI]. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of CLI |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
All source notations of the 2nd half of the bar are erroneous or unclear, however, none of them can be corrected in a way that would not be questioned.
In this situation, we base the main text on the version of A which, in spite of its inaccuracies, seems to be the most reliable, as far as the authenticity is concerned. Out of two natural possibilities of correcting the mistake (changing two demisemiquavers to hemidemisemiquavers or deleting one of the dots extending the e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Holding the g category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A the first chord in the L.H. is a crotchet. The possible mistake (theoretically it could be considered as a simplified two-voice notation) was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the part of the R.H. it is only GE2 that does not contain a rhythmic error. The version, however, resulted from a revision and it certainly does not correspond to Chopin's intention. For the remaining sources (except for EE3), we adopt an interpretation compatible with the way the R.H. is planned with respect to the quavers in the L.H. As the text of EE3 we adopt the rhythm that, according to us, predominates at the time of interpreting the easiest perceptible elements of the rhythm: a crotchet, an extended crotchet and a group of semiquavers with a triplet inside. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |