![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : No initial dynamic marking
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
Omission of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: No initial dynamic marking , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: No initial dynamic marking , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In this case, the missing dynamic marking at the beginning of the piece, quite rare in Chopin's pieces, indicates, according to us, dynamics in between category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: No initial dynamic marking |
|||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
It is impossible to state whether the omission of the dynamic marking in GE was intentional without [AG]. Due to the above reason, in the main text we include mezza voce from AF (→FE→EE) in a variant form. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: No initial dynamic marking |
|||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 4, Mazurka in C# minor
..
It is difficult to say how the difference in the indications at the beginning of the piece occurred. As legato was not being removed in FC, it was probably added by Chopin in the stage of proofreading FE or to the basis thereof. One of these scenarios presented an opportunity for a possible removal of category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: No initial dynamic marking , Authentic corrections of FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »