![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Centrally placed marks
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Not being certain whether the lack of sempre legato in FE (→GE,EE) is accidental, we give the indication in brackets. In bars 45-46 the analogous passage is embraced with slurs in all sources, which indirectly confirms the legato articulation also in this case. In spite of the fact that the indication in A begins only in the 2nd group of semiquavers, its binding force from the beginning of the passage is undeniable. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||||
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The difference in the position of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||||
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In A category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||||
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The
The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Centrally placed marks |