![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : fz – f
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The
Due to these reasons we omit this category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , fz – f |
||||||||
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Change of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , fz – f |
||||||||
b. 16-18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The error of FE (→GE,EE) in bar 16 is undeniable:
In all the aforementioned bars AI has only accents, without additional indications. Cf. bars 20-22. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The way in which the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
The type of the sign indicating the local culmination and its exact placement raise some doubts here:
In the main text we suggest a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: fz – f , Centrally placed marks |