|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In the main text we give the title and dedication in the undoubtedly authentic version adopted in FE. The extensions of both the title (in GE and EE) and dedication (in EE) most probably come from the editors. See Etude in C, No. 1, bar 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The tempo indication Vivace was most probably introduced by Chopin in the base text for EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of tempo markings , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 1-7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The sources differ in the length of the initial phrase of the Etude, provided with the slurs in the L.H. As there is no doubt that the aforementioned slurs are written as a model and the similar slurring generally applies in the entire Etude, all these notations should be considered as equal. In the main text we give the version of A, as undoubtedly authentic and later than AI (in FE the missing slurs in bar 2 may be accidental). See also bars 8 and 9-16. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In the main text we consider the fingering of the R.H. added in FED. category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
